<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>GeoBliki's Blog: Tag R</title>
    <link>http://geobliki.com/articles/tag/r?tag=r</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Sensor Web Enabled (SWE) Data Node </description>
    <item>
      <title>Architecture &amp;amp; Process: What was WfXML-R doing at that conference?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Since &lt;a href='http://www.column2.com/2008/04/architecture-process-pat-cappelaere/trackback/'&gt;Sandy Kemsley&lt;/a&gt; asked the question, I will try to attempt to explain this a second time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.transformationandinnovation.com/pages/ArchitectureProcess2008.htm'&gt;Architecture &amp;amp; Process 2008&lt;/a&gt; is a great avenue to expose users &amp;amp; architects to new key technologies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Enterprise Architecture and current BPM initiatives are pretty much based on a SOAP-based architecture.  This is a wonderful high-octane technology, if you and your pit crew can afford it.  But this is reserved to an elite group targeting a niche market: Corporate America 500 that can afford it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WfXML-R targets that rest of the market (or the remaining 80% of it) with a simpler approach based on several Web 2.0 standards and protocols including Atom/AtomPub, GData, OpenSearch and OpenID/OAuth to manage user authentication, secure transactions and user authority delegation to workflows.   The last two standards were the final keystones to a RESTful architecture that can be used at the Enterprise level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So what is this doing at this Conference? Hummmmm????&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An RESTful interoperable and non-proprietary standard sponsored by the WfMC and the OpenGeoSpatial Consortium will be a huge achievement for this Community.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The OGC demonstrated three interoperable workflow engines during OWS-5 using WfXML-R inclusing OpenWFE and a BPEL engine.  Hitachi Interstage and the SUNGARD Carnot may very well be next based on discussions we had this week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is at least satisfying that some other people such as &lt;a href='http://jasonwoodruff.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/wfxml-r/trackback'&gt;Jason Woodruff&lt;/a&gt; got it right away and seem pretty excited about it.
And yes, Jason, Interface 3 could be another one that ought to be included.  But not this time!  BPAF is next and I will let Michael zur Muelhen announce it very soon :).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:d90e997c-46f2-4a54-a44e-0d41bfefa400</guid>
      <author>Patrice Cappelaere</author>
      <link>http://geobliki.com/articles/2008/04/25/architecture-process-what-was-wfxml-r-doing-at-that-conference</link>
      <category>WfXML</category>
      <category>R</category>
      <category>BPMN</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://geobliki.com/articles/trackback/251</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
